Stone Circles

Nynke May 23rd, 2006

I was asked again what it is that one can balance with Balancing Act? My reply has been “Our brainhalves for wholebrainedness”. That’s rather short.

With some thought, this is a longer answer: If we can only perceive with our rational mind, we lack connection with our other brain half. Meaning, we lack a holistic way of seeing things. We can’t see all around us, and most often, we can not hear what is not being said either. And if we do see and hear, we are likely to say to our selves its mere “phantoms” or “internal babble” and “irrelevant”, regardless of source, self or others.

In this state we can easily fall prey to intellectual arrogance where we only accept those things our mind can comprehend, that can be shown, and be proven “to be according to theory”. We see spiritual insight as unscientific and reject the spiritual.

If we check our giving/receiving, inner/outer richness, separation/(w)holeness, and expression freedoms/tonality balances, likely we will find recognizable patterns/reflections of what unbalances us, giving us clues for (re)perceiving “reality” and balancing our actions better and more openly when fitting.

For more of this seemingly muddled bubbling from me,
go forward to
Balancing calls for Balance
Walking Talk and Talking Walk
Transparent Measurements

balancing, diagram of effects, transparency, wholebrained

• people & systems